Do you actually use these products?

No, and the pages say so everywhere. This desk reads what vendors publish: pricing pages, terms, privacy and content policies, checkout flows. It records what is in them. Buying a dozen adult subscriptions to produce a star rating is how most comparison sites justify numbers nobody can reproduce; reading the documents produces findings anyone can check in ten minutes.

Then what is a verdict here?

A statement about the paperwork. Whether a limit is published in countable units, whether output rights are granted, whether a retention period exists, whether cancellation is self-service. Those decide more purchases in this category than output quality does, and unlike output quality they can be verified from outside.

Why does it matter that answers sit in four different documents?

Because that is the mechanism. The pricing page advertises, the terms take back the rights, the privacy policy sets the retention, and the content policy decides whether the operator survives its payment processor. Reading only the first one is what every unhappy subscriber did.

One paid placement, named in the footer of every page and labelled wherever it runs. The advertiser is subject to the same walk as everyone else, and until its documents have been read its slot stays empty rather than being filled with adjectives.

What do these vendors actually publish?

Not how good the output is — everyone writes that, and nobody can show their working. The question here is narrower and answerable: open the six documents a buyer would have to open, and write down what is in them.

Read the six documents See the seven compared

Claim checks, not benchmarks Four editions Revised 2026-10-19

What this desk does

An adult AI subscription is bought on the strength of a pricing page and regretted on the strength of three other documents. That is the pattern behind nearly every complaint in this category, and it is why the work here is reading rather than testing.

We do not hold accounts with any vendor and we do not buy subscriptions. Nothing on this site reports how fast a model is, how a clip looked or how clever a chat felt, because we would have no way to show you how we arrived at it. What we can do is open the documents, quote them with a date, and name what is not in them — which turns out to be the part that costs people money.

The finding that repeats

Across this category the pricing page is written to be read and the other three are written to be skipped. Nothing about that is accidental, and the gap between them is where a subscription turns out to be something other than it looked.

The six documents

The same walk runs on every page here, in this order. It is reproducible: everything in it is public, and none of it requires an account.

Pricing page

Are the limits stated in units a buyer can count?

Satisfied by

Clip length in seconds, resolution in pixels, generations per day as a number, queue priority described in words that mean something.

Usually found

A credit balance with no stated conversion, and the word unlimited somewhere above a fair-use clause that contradicts it.

At stake

This is the difference between a subscription that finishes work and one that runs out on a Tuesday.
Terms of service

Who holds rights in what the tool produces?

Satisfied by

An explicit grant of output rights to the user, and a narrow, stated licence back to the vendor for operating the service.

Usually found

Silence about the user's rights and a broad perpetual licence to the vendor covering promotion and model training.

At stake

Publishing anything made with the tool depends entirely on this paragraph, and it is never on the pricing page.
Privacy policy

How long are prompts and generations kept, and can they be deleted?

Satisfied by

A retention period in days or months, a deletion route that removes rather than flags, and a plain statement about training use.

Usually found

No period at all, deletion described as account closure, and training use addressed in a sentence that could mean either thing.

At stake

Prompts in this category are the most sensitive record a consumer service can hold. Indefinite retention turns one breach into a permanent problem.
Content policy

What is prohibited, and is likeness transfer named?

Satisfied by

A published list of prohibited categories, with material involving real people's likenesses explicitly among them.

Usually found

A policy that bans the obvious and stays quiet about likeness, which is the one that decides whether the operator survives the year.

At stake

An operator vague about likeness is an operator one enforcement action away from taking your purchased credits down with it.
Checkout and cancellation

What appears on the statement, and how does a subscription end?

Satisfied by

The billing descriptor published before payment, renewal terms stated in the flow, and cancellation available from inside the account.

Usually found

An undisclosed descriptor, a trial that upgrades to annual, and cancellation by email to an address answered in business days.

At stake

Subscription disputes are the most common complaint in adult services, and every one of them was decided at checkout.
Support channel

Can a question be asked before any money moves?

Satisfied by

A channel that answers a pre-sales question — anything from a ticket form to a staffed chat — with a human reply.

Usually found

A form that routes to nothing, or a help centre whose articles were written for a different product.

At stake

The channel that will not answer before payment is the channel that will not answer about a renewal.

The same document, put to everyone

Run down one vendor and you learn about that vendor. Run across the category with one document in hand and you learn whether the question is answerable at all. Here is the second document in the walk, the terms, put to all seven at once.

3 of 7 · Published: OurDream AI, Nastia AI, Kalon AI
2 of 7 · Contradicted elsewhere: CrushOn AI, Candy AI
2 of 7 · Not published: Perchance, JuicyChat AI

Terms of service, read for all seven on 20 October 2026. The question put to it: Who holds rights in what the tool produces?

Three of the seven answer it the way the check asks: an explicit grant of output rights, and a licence back that stays inside what running the service needs. Two more answer and then undercut themselves — one says the user keeps ownership and separately forbids using anything generated commercially, the other grants a licence over everything submitted to every other user of the service. That is why this figure has a colour for contradicted and not only for missing. The reading for each one is on its entry.

Where to start reading

Every page runs the same six-document walk against its subject.
If you are deciding about	Start here
Short clips from a prompt	Video generators
Animating a still you made	Image to video
Stills and character sheets	Image generators
A companion that remembers	Companion chat
Stylised 2D work	Anime and cartoon
A specific name you were given	All checks

Paid placement

SpicyAI — Discover AI characters with unique personalities. Chat, share stories, or create a companion of your own — with text, voice, images, and video.

Contradicted elsewhere Pricing page. The only vendor read here that publishes its limits and its prices without a sign-in: $6.99 a week, $9.90 a month, $59.88 for twelve months, with 100 images and 10 videos a month on Premium. The same page then states the free allowance twice, as five chat turns on the plan card and ten turns per character in the table, and the Premium allowance twice, as unlimited on the card and 1,000 turns in total in the table.

Published Terms of service. Effective 2 December 2025, with the operator named and a contact address in the document. The user owns what they generate, and the licence running back is perpetual, irrevocable, sublicensable and transferable — and extends beyond operating the service to promotion and advertising.

Published Privacy policy. No retention period: the policy gives the factors it weighs instead, which is the same answer six of the eight catalogued vendors give. Chats and user content are used to train the models and are monitored for compliance, and the policy says so plainly rather than burying it.

Contradicted elsewhere Content policy. The community guidelines are the strongest of any vendor read here: eighteen and over, no character presented as younger than that and no aged-up rewrite of one, no sexualised depictions of real people without consent, human and automated review. The public tag list then carries jk, a Japanese abbreviation that denotes exactly the age bracket those guidelines rule out.

Published Checkout and cancellation. Card only, with other methods described as coming. Cancellation any time, with access running to the end of the billing cycle and no further charge — stated on the page where the subscription is sold rather than in a separate document.

Contradicted elsewhere Support channel. A support address is published, which several vendors here do not manage. Two of them, in fact: the terms give one address and the community guidelines give the same mailbox at a different domain.

Go to SpicyAI Go to the Telegram bot

About this desk

Do you actually use these products?: No, and the pages say so everywhere. This desk reads what vendors publish: pricing pages, terms, privacy and content policies, checkout flows. It records what is in them. Buying a dozen adult subscriptions to produce a star rating is how most comparison sites justify numbers nobody can reproduce; reading the documents produces findings anyone can check in ten minutes.
Then what is a verdict here?: A statement about the paperwork. Whether a limit is published in countable units, whether output rights are granted, whether a retention period exists, whether cancellation is self-service. Those decide more purchases in this category than output quality does, and unlike output quality they can be verified from outside.
Why does it matter that answers sit in four different documents?: Because that is the mechanism. The pricing page advertises, the terms take back the rights, the privacy policy sets the retention, and the content policy decides whether the operator survives its payment processor. Reading only the first one is what every unhappy subscriber did.
Who pays for this?: One paid placement, named in the footer of every page and labelled wherever it runs. The advertiser is subject to the same walk as everyone else, and until its documents have been read its slot stays empty rather than being filled with adjectives.

Editions

Three markets get their own edition, because the legal position differs and the pricing conversation differs with it: 한국어, Melayu, India.